Currently, there's a period where the API is `Offline` even though it is
about to connect (as soon as the `run` thread starts up).
This can cause any `Queue`d requests to fail if they arrive too early.
To avoid this, let's ensure the `Connecting` state is set as early as
possible.
I noticed in passing that in a very edge case scenario where the API's
`run` thread doesn't run before it is loaded into the game, something
could access it and get a guest `LocalUser` when the local user actually
has a valid login.
Put another way, the `protected HasLogin` could be `true` while
`LocalUser` is `Guest`.
I think we want to avoid this, so I've moved the initial set of the
local user earlier in the initialisation process.
If this is controversial in any way, the PR can be closed and we can
assume no one is ever going to run into this scenario (or that it
doesn't matter enough even if they did).
What I think was happening here is that the dump of the accuracy
counter's state was happening too early. The component is loaded
synchronously into the `ISerialisableDrawableContainer` before its
default position is set via the "apply defaults" `ArgonSkin` flow
- so the test needs to wait for that to take place first.
Closes https://github.com/ppy/osu/issues/25608.
Logic mostly matching stable. All operations are done on `ComboOffset`
which still makes overridden combo colours weirdly relatively dependent
on each other rather than them be an "absolute" choice, but alas...
As per stable, two consecutive new combos can use the same colour only
if they are separated by a break:
52f3f75ed7/osu!/GameModes/Edit/Modes/EditorModeCompose.cs#L4564-L4571
This control is only available once the user has changed the combo
colours from defaults; additionally, only a single new combo object
must be selected for the colour selector to show up.
As I look into re-implementing the ability to choose combo colour for an
object (also known as "colourhax") from the editor UI, I stumble upon
these wretched ternary items again and sigh a deep sigh of annoyance.
The structure is overly rigid. `TernaryItem` does nothing that
`DrawableTernaryItem` couldn't, except make it more annoying to add
specific sub-variants of `DrawableTernaryItem` that could do more
things.
Yes you could sprinkle more levels of virtuals to
`CreateDrawableButton()` or something, but after all, as Saint Exupéry
says, "perfection is finally attained not when there is no longer
anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away."
So I'm leaning for taking one step towards perfection.
